At the Mountains of Madness (1936), HP Lovecraft

There was an odour…. 

William Dyer is a university professor at Miskatonic University and this is his report of the expedition he lead to the Antarctic and the unexpected discoveries his team uncovered. His first communications to the outside world are full of exciting finds and praise for his men and their dedication. As the expedition continues, however, there are horrific accidents, missing team members and puzzling evidence of a past civilization that doesn’t make sense on the timeline of evolution. So traumatized are he and his men over the events they witnessed, he would have preferred to forget all that took place, but when he finds out another expedition is forming he hopes a more detailed description will discourage them. 

His report begins soon after the company arrives in Antarctica. Once the team settles into base camp an advanced party, lead by Professor Lake, sets out in a transport plane bringing equipment that will allow the team to take core samples in the heretofore unexplored wilderness of Antarctica. Sled dogs are also brought for transportation over the icy surface as are all kinds of tools for scientific and geologic sampling. With each sighting of mountains or other geologic formation Lake relays back to Dr. Dyer who then communicates the findings to the University.  

In the first communications are descriptions of a mountain range higher by tens of thousands of feet in elevation than any known in other parts of the world with a geological formation that looks as if it was carved by human hands. When organic life forms are found and taken out of the layers of ice, Lake decides to dissect them. With each new discovery pulled from their icy resting place, the dogs became more and more agitated until a special compound has to be built for them away from camp.  

There is no consensus between Lake and Dyer if the forms are vegetable or animal in origin, but as Lake continues his dissection he discovers more and more of a complex internal design exciting both men. Suddenly, however, all communication from Lake ceases. After several hours pass in silence Dyer mounts a search party. 

Anyone who knows the tropes of science fiction novels, short stories or the set-in-the-Antarctic B movies of the 1950s and 60s knows what is going to be found at the camp of the missing party, because nothing good ever comes of an expedition to the Antarctic! Monsters? Aliens? Organic life deformed by a nuclear chemical accident? A small party goes out to explore and they all go missing? Dogs trying to give warning that something is off kilter, but are ignored, or worse, put outside?  

When Lake signs off for the night covering up the “creatures” after hours of dissection the suspense has been building up to this moment. He’s already described how the warmth of the air compared to the temperature underground has made the specimens more pliable. He describes a smell generated by the specimens and the annoyance of the barking dogs. Spoilers of all kinds swirl around through each passing page. You know what is going to happen. So what keeps you reading? 

The story telling. The dangling-the-carrot of possibilities of horror that are obvious and in plain sight. But it is in the details of the almost breathless manner in the way he writes Dyer’s communication of his findings that Lovecraft excels. It is his incredible imagination coupled with a solid understanding of science, anthropology, geology and a flair for conveying the fantastic that brings Dyer’s discoveries of this ancient civilization to compelling life once he finds the murals and sculptures that tell the story of the Old Ones who populated the land long before the known historical record. And by bringing in what IS known of the historical, the geological and the geographical record Lovecraft creates both a realistic understanding of the “authorized” version of evolved life and the challenge to that with these new discoveries. There is enough interest and great story telling not to deter the reader from continuing on this journey even though experience in the genre and pure common sense has you shouting, “don’t split up” or “the dogs are trying to tell you something” or “put those life forms back where you found them and bury them deep!”

RESEARCH 

The paintings of Nicholas Roerich were an influence on Lovecraft’s descriptions of the mountains Lake discovers.

I discovered Lovecraft had a life-long interest in the Antarctic and even as a child wrote stories based on books he’d read about the region. He followed the Byrd expedition which occurred just before he wrote the novel and he may have been influenced by the partial Antarctic setting of Poe’s novel, The Narrative of Arthur Gordon Pym of Nantucket. Having done his own research of the continent and knowing how little was explored, gave Lovecraft license to use his already active imagination to create a sophisticated singular epic tale of the already mysterious and inscrutable Antarctic. 

The ceaseless five-pointedness of the surrounding architecture and of the few distinguishable mural arabesques had a dimly sinister suggestiveness we could not escape.

The tremendous significance lies in what we dared not tell–what I would not tell now but for the need of warning others off from nameless terrors.

The beings seem to have had no trouble in adapting themselves to part-time residence under water; since they had never allowed their gill systems to atrophy.

These were the Great Old Ones that had filtered down from the stars when earth was young-the beings whose substance an alien evolution had shaped, and whose powers were such as this planet had never bred.

The Magician (1908) W. Somerset Maugham

Sometimes my mind is verily haunted by the desire to see a lifeless substance move under my spells, by the desire to be as God.

There is so much to unpack in this novel. Its theme of creating and reanimating life is so immoral, yet the narrative is guiltily compelling. Maugham presents a world of necromancy, sex magic, time travel, hallucinogenic spells and murderous revenge in which he leaves nothing to the imagination and where otherwise normal men and women are taken on an outrageous occultic ride. 

At her fiancé Arthur Burdon’s request Margaret Dauncey has moved to Paris to experience life before their wedding. Mary is an artist and has found a room with Susie Boyd, her former teacher, and together they explore the art world of Paris. Arthur, a surgeon, lives in London and is presently visiting Margaret occasionally meeting up with Dr. Porhoët, a former medical school professor who continues to mentor him.  

The four are taking an evening stroll when they meet Oliver Haddo an acquaintance of Porhoët. He is charming, intelligent, well-traveled and knows everything about any subject that comes up and as the days go by has insinuated himself into their lives. But something about him has unsettled them all. Margaret has an innate repulsion, Susie is fascinated though a little wary of his tales of Egyptian snake charmers and other stories that bend reality. Arthur, the scientific skeptic, is not impressed by these ridiculous events, while Dr. Porhoët listens quietly, as his hobby is research on the occult and unexplained phenomena. Porhoët tells them later Haddo is reputed to be a magician and practitioner of the dark arts, but finds such a negative assessment hard to believe in someone so charming and brilliant. 

But is there truth to these rumors? With each luncheon or tea or after dinner walk Haddo brings suspicion and fear to the four. One evening, he puts his hand on a horse, ostensibly to steady it, but it trembles so severely at his touch it almost collapses, then at Margaret’s house her little dog is so fearful of Haddo he hides in a corner. When Haddo forces the dog come to him, the dog bites him and Haddo kicks it causing Arthur to attack him. This event is the beginning of Haddo’s revenge toward Arthur and his power over Margaret. 

As the story unfolds we learn the truth of Haddo’s plans, of his mind control over Marget and watch as he degenerates into unspeakable experiments in his laboratory.

Maugham writes with such realism that I felt chills as I read through the necromancy operations. As I read later, this realism incensed Aleister Crowely the infamous mage and occultist of the time and model for Oliver Haddo whom Maugham had met in Paris. It is not a flattering portrait and Crowley, who has had great influence on modern magical and occult matters, irrationally accused Maugham of plagiarizing the story from other occult books.  

Maugham denied Crowley’s accusations saying his information on the black arts and human experimentation came from research he had done in the British Museum. But his five years of medical school must have also helped! 

Thoughts

I pondered the morality of reanimating the dead or creating a human body in a basin using the blood of a virgin and magical incantations with our own modern version that is medically and morally sanctioned. We herald as a great achievement creating life in a test tube with egg and sperm or stem cells that repair or regenerate other cells in the human body. Now, people who otherwise could not have children have a chance to be parents. And a devastating medical condition can be treated by our own stem cells. Is this the black arts reimagined, but for the Good? Will we regret any of this? I hope not….

At any rate, I enjoyed this book. It is a real page turner and I highly recommend it. For anyone participating in RIP it is perfect, but I do suggest no late night reading, unless all the lights are turned on!

The old alchemists believed in the possibility of spontaneous generation. By the combination of psychical powers and of strange essences they claim to have created forms in which life became manifest.

In vain they lit their furnaces, and in vain they studied their crabbed books, called up the dead, and conjured ghastly spirits. Their reward was disappointment and wretchedness, poverty, the scorn of men, torture, imprisonment, and shameful death. 

Frankenstein (1818), Mary Shelley

Perhaps a corpse would be re-animated;…perhaps the component parts of a creature might be manufactured, brought together, and endued with vital warmth.”

Mary Shelley

“Alas! I had turned loose into the world a depraved wretch, whose delight was in carnage and misery…”

Victor Frankenstein

The catalyst for Frankenstein Mary Shelley explains, is that she and her husband Percy were visiting the home of Lord Byron one dark and stormy night, when Byron laid down the challenge that each must tell a ghost story. Byron and Percy were able to create a story on the spot, but it took Mary a few days. In fact, she dreamed it. The result is one of the world’s most well-known classic tales of necromancy and Gothic story-telling.

As often happens when I read a classic novel that has seen countless film adaptations, I was very surprised that the book tackles far more than just the ‘monster parts.’  Shelley proposes thoughtful and deep topics and asks questions about personal responsibility, the quest for life’s purpose and leaves me wondering whether a monster has a soul?

Frankenstein is told as a story within a story by Robert Walton who is at sea and is corresponding with his sister, Margaret. But when the ship gets stuck in the ice floes of the Arctic, in the span of a few hours two very odd things happen. First, the crew spots a huge human-like creature driving a sledge with a pack of dogs passing at a distance. The next morning, they find another man, but more normal-looking, who is also driving a sledge, floating near them on the ice. He is near dead. The crew rescues him, revives him and while recuperating tells Walton how he came to be floundering on an ice floe in the middle of the Arctic. Walton records the tale for his sister in a journal. Frankenstein is the story of Victor Frankenstein, youthful scientist and budding necromancer whose interest in natural philosophy takes a turn from the traditional path of changing lead into gold to the perilous route toward creating life from death.

At university, Victor studies physiology, anatomy, the life process and the progression of death; he visits charnel houses and sees how the body corrupts and wastes away after the bloom of life.

After days and nights of incredible labour and fatigue, I succeeded in discovering the cause of generation and life; nay, more, I became myself capable of bestowing animation upon lifeless matter….It was already one in the morning….I saw the dull yellow eye of the creature open; it breathed hard, and a convulsive motion agitated its limbs.

After two years of working toward this goal of animating life from death Frankenstein succeeds. But instead of celebrating the work, he is horrified. He has created a creature, a monster. He cannot sleep for the nightmares that consume his waking and sleeping hours and falls into a many-month illness. From the very beginning that sparked the life of the monster, Victor is unable to accept responsibility for what he has created or the repercussions of the monster’s actions. This weakness in character will hound him for the rest of this life.

Meanwhile, the monster flees the town. He is a fully formed human-like man and as he roams the countryside coming into contact with people he not only sees, but feels their fear and disgust. He shows up near Victor’s home and kills his younger brother. Victor is still at university when he hears William has been murdered; he knows it is the monster. Unable to confess to the authorities what he knows for fear of being branded insane, he keeps quiet. An investigation and trial is held for the murder and through circumstantial evidence Justine, a trusted family servant of the Frankensteins is convicted of the crime and hanged. “The first hapless victims of my unhallowed arts.”

The monster is desperate for a place of refuge and finds it in an abandoned hovel near a cottage. The cottage is occupied by a brother, sister and their father. Through watching the interactions of the siblings as they care for their blind father he learns how they take care of one another, how they speak in kindness toward each other and what it means to be part of a family. Aware of his physical deformities he knows to keep out of sight, but he takes a chance on the father when the children are away during the day and forms a friendship with him. But the day comes when the children see him and the family flees the cottage. Brokenhearted, the monster understands his kindness or concern for others will always be outweighed by his physical appearance. There is no place on earth for him.

Where were my friends and relations? No father had watched my infant days, no mother had blessed me with smiles and caresses;…From my earliest remembrance I had been as I then was in height and proportion. I had never yet seen a being resembling me, or who claimed any intercourse with me. What was I?

The monster finally confronts Frankenstein and describes his life, how he came to speak, to think, to understand society by watching this family. And now, by bitter experience he will never be able to live as they do, in a family or as a common man.

Remember, that I am thy creature; I ought to be thy Adam; but I am rather the fallen angel, whom thou drivest from joy for no misdeed. Every where I see bliss, from which I alone am irrevocably  excluded. I was benevolent and good; misery made me a fiend. Make me happy, and I shall again be virtuous.

He pleads with Frankenstein to make him a companion like himself, so he can live as he sees others doing.

You must create a female for me, with whom I can live in the interchange of those sympathies necessary for my being….I now indulge in dreams of bliss that cannot be realized

What I ask of you is reasonable and moderate; I demand a creature of another sex, but as hideous as myself….we shall be monsters…Our lives will not be happy, but they will be harmless, and free from the misery I now feel.

The monster compels Frankenstein to this task and promises to live in secret, perpetrating no violence to any animal and away from any human contact.

Victor Frankenstein indeed created a monster, but what is amazing about this one is his heart, soul and intelligence. He has the potential to be every bit as kind and compassionate, moral and honest as any other man, yet he will never be accepted because of his physical appearance. No matter his good works or heroic deeds, his physical presentation will always negate his integrity.

My Thoughts

Victor Frankenstein turns his back on what he created. He abandons him on the first night, but once he hears his story, it is obvious this is a feeling, thinking human-type being, deserving of assistance, mercy and companionship. Would someone who created life really reject it like he did? The monster may be hideous to look at, but inside he is made like any other human being with the full capacity of feelings and outlook on life.

Would you reject a “nonperfect” child and would you expect it to fend for itself? Or is this something entirely different? Because the monster is not a helpless baby, but came into the world fully formed, who learned to speak, to cultivate his intelligence, to live in the world through observation, because he was made with wisdom already intact. Does he have a soul? He acts like it. He quickly becomes Victor’s intellectual equal. And Victor is given ample opportunity to make things right for him, instead he gives into fear.

Hounded for years by the being he created, Victor dies on the ship still unrepentant and without accepting any responsibility toward the monster; even as he lay dying he just wants the wretch dead.

The fate of the monster is sealed at Frankenstein’s death. Walton hears noises coming from the room where Frankenstein has died. He sees that it is the monster lamenting his existence that there will now never be redress against the man who created him.

Frankenstein forced him to a life of misery and neglect and now he will end his own on a “funeral pile triumphantly, and exult in the agony of the torturing flames….my ashes will be swept into the sea by the winds. My spirit will sleep in peace….”

Shelley goes through such pains to tell the monster’s story and she imbues the creature with humanity and sympathy as with any other human being. She shows his compassion, his intelligence; he is creative, hard-working and capable of contributing positively to society. He develops the full capacity of feelings, agency and responsibility for others and this is to me the tragedy of Frankenstein and his monster.

Because the monster is a victim. And it is easy to interpret Frankenstein as a warning for these modern times as science advances toward cloning and other forms of creating genetically modified life. Can we use Frankenstein as a forewarning to illustrate imagination gone wrong, to get us to think about the results of such experimentation and to ask how and what we are responsible for when we take these steps? Is creation and human life about outward appearances as we go about creating perfect people? What do we owe to them when they turn out to be not so perfect?

Once I falsely hoped to meet with beings, who, pardoning my outward form, would love me for the excellent qualities which I was capable of unfolding. I was nourished with high thoughts of honour and devotion….When I run over the frightful catalogue of my sins, I cannot believe that I am the same creature whose thoughts were once filled with sublime and transcendent visions of the beauty and the majesty of goodness. But it is even so; the fallen angel becomes a malignant devil. Yet even that enemy of God and man had friends and associates in his desolation; I am alone.

The Case of Charles Dexter Ward (1941), HP Lovecraft

…he was never a fiend or even truly a madman, but only an eager, studious, and curious boy whose love of mystery and of the past was his undoing. He stumbled on things no mortal ought ever to know, and reached back through the years as no one ever should reach; and something came out of those years to engulf him.

I had a lot of trepidation toward this book. H.P. Lovecraft is often called a ‘master of horror,’ a genre I do not enjoy. But when the opportunity came up to choose a Rhode Island author through the Reading New England Challenge, I decided to take the plunge and picked Lovecraft’s, The Case of Charles Dexter Ward.

Reincarnation—-Alchemy—-Calling in Demons and Spirits—-The Slave Trade

The story concerns young Charles Dexter Ward who begins innocently enough to research a 17th century ancestor, Joseph Curwen, but becomes so caught up in the work that it is obvious to all around him he has gone too far. And soon it looks like Charles begins to actually become Curwen, through reliving his life as a mage and master of the black arts of Renaissance magic. Charles finds Curwen’s journal and papers, learns the rites and rituals, the formulas, the chants, and he learns of his trafficking in slaves who were kept for unimaginable purposes. Charles spends several years traveling throughout Europe in search of obscure manuscripts and books and to study in secret with other masters of this lost art.

He also learns Curwen met a violent end when his neighbors had enough of his odd behavior, the odors and otherworldly sounds that came from his house, the changes in weather, the depressive and ghostly feelings that emanated throughout the town and the many suspect incidents surrounding him forcing the men of the town to confront him. On that fateful night, they marched to his home, but whatever it was they saw in his house it caused some to go insane and the rest such fear no one ever spoke of it.

One hundred and fifty years later his young relative Charles Dexter Ward, who bears a striking resemblance to Curwen, after researching his life and himself learning the rites and rituals of the alchemic mage comes across Curwen’s ashes and is able to reanimate him. But Curwen kills him and resumes his evil life as well as pretending to Charles’s family he is their son. However, his personality, his handwriting and vocabulary are so archaic that he is deemed insane and is placed in a mental institution. It is only after Charles’s life-long physician Dr. Willett, who has never lost hope he could help Charles get through his insanity, the truth of this horrendous mystery is solved.

But what is the horror? While there are nebulous descriptions of human torture, repetitions of magical incantations that leave Charles’s parents and servants scared and concerned, Dr. Willett’s absolutely harrowing escape through the laboratory of alchemy, descriptions of evil presences that leave traces in rooms, so little is actually detailed. We are taken on this journey throughout multiple centuries with hints, generalizations and whatever our imaginations can create. The blood and gore is vague, what the ‘organic creatures,’ who have been living in the bowels of the lab for centuries really are with their howls and sounds of pleading, is not so much horrifying as it is mysterious. Lovecraft gives just enough information to make you want to know more, to keep going with the story in hopes something concrete will explain everything.

This is the kind of horror in our minds, what we create from what we think someone is saying. Like Shirley Jackson’s, The Haunting of Hill House where the horror isn’t of the concrete monster-type or of blood and guts flung about, but is determined by how active is our individual imagination. There is so much power in words, so much power in tiny suggestions that scare us in our own minds that subtlety is all that is needed to make the reader see the absolute worst.

I am not sure if this way of story-telling was intentional by Lovecraft or just the way I received it, but it was very effective and in the end, I was left with so many questions and that ache to know more. Which means this story was successful, because that one untied string or element left unsolved keeps me in the story, keeps me in the mystery.

Well done, Mr. Lovecraft, you just made a new horror convert…or at least, a new Lovecraftian!